Loading Vaultize
Skip to main content

Prove control

Audit evidence should take minutes, not archaeology

File-level accountability is becoming a regulatory and investigative requirement.

  • Identity
  • Policy
  • Revoke
  • Audit

DPO, CRO, Internal Audit, Legal

File-level activity, sharing and policy-action records

Exportable evidence for audit and investigation

10audit evidence requests

The answer in 30 seconds

Centralize file-level access, sharing, edit, movement and deletion evidence for audit and investigation.

Challenge the status quo

Can you produce one sensitive file’s access and sharing history in minutes?

When an auditor or investigator asks what happened to a sensitive file, most organizations begin a reconstruction exercise. Identity logs show login. Email logs show delivery. Storage logs show access. DLP shows an event. None of them alone tells the complete file journey.

Evidence request 01

Who accessed this file

Today it is answered by
An identity log that proves a login, not a file access
Where the evidence is scattered
Identity logsaccess logs

Evidence route

Inside one evidence trail
An identity log that proves a login, not a file access
2 evidence sources of a copy

Scattered logs

Reconstruction by hand

File record

Evidence in minutes

Each one ends the same way: an answer assembled by hand from systems that each saw only part of the file’s journey.

Why this matters now

The control gap appears when business use begins.

The operational test is simple: for one sensitive file, can the organization produce its access and sharing history in minutes? If not, audit readiness remains dependent on manual archaeology.

  1. 01

    Why reconstruction no longer holds

    This fragmented model is increasingly difficult to defend. Regulators, boards and courts expect timely evidence. A control that cannot be demonstrated quickly may be treated as a control that does not exist.

  2. 02

    Why now

    Privacy regulation, sectoral oversight and incident-response expectations are converging around accountability. Organizations must show who accessed data, where it moved, what changed, whether it was deleted and what policy was applied. The demand is not merely for logs; it is for usable evidence.

  3. 03

    The cost of inaction

    Slow evidence collection increases investigation time, legal cost and regulatory risk. It can also weaken the organization’s position when records are incomplete or inconsistent. Teams spend days correlating systems while the incident continues.

  4. 04

    What Vaultize changes

    Vaultize centralizes exportable records of access, sharing, edits, movement, deletion and policy actions for governed content. This supports control testing, incident investigation and customer-specific compliance evidence. Vaultize does not replace formal legal mapping, but it gives the organization a stronger technical evidence layer.

Cost of inaction

Four risks that outlive the audit.

  • Loss of control

    Access, retention and redistribution continue beyond the organization’s effective reach.

  • Weak evidence

    Audit and investigation depend on fragmented records or voluntary cooperation.

  • Business exposure

    Confidentiality loss can affect revenue, litigation, compliance, trust and strategic position.

  • Slow response

    Offboarding, revocation, recovery or legal retrieval becomes manual and uncertain.

The Vaultize value proposition

What Vaultize keeps attached to the governed file

Vaultize carries identity, protection, policy, revocation and activity evidence with the sensitive file. Existing infrastructure remains essential; Vaultize closes the continuing-governance gap after the file moves, is shared or is downloaded.

File-level activity records

Vaultize Seal tracks and audits every access to a sealed file, writing per-access audit and telemetry for each open, print, copy or forward wherever the copy has travelled. Vaultize Share adds a full recipient audit trail for each governed link or portal, so the file and the people who received it are recorded together. Applied within the supported Vaultize workflow and policy configuration.

Exportable evidence

The modules share one audit plane, so access history, sharing records, classification history, revocation and recovery records belong to a single evidence trail rather than several separate consoles. Vaultize Share produces audit trails and reports over that trail, so an evidence request can be answered from one place instead of correlated across systems.

Policy-action history

The policy decision is recorded alongside the access it governed: the view, edit, print, copy and forward rights sealed into the file, the geo, IP, time, device and domain conditions evaluated when it was opened, the real-time policy updates applied after distribution and the revocations that withdrew access. Forward tracking keeps the sharing chain visible rather than inferred.

Customer-specific compliance mapping

Vaultize supplies the technical evidence layer and the organization keeps the mapping to its own obligations. Vaultize Secure holds tamper-evident audit records with immutable version history and recovery, so the document behind an event can still be produced, and Discover & Classify contributes its audit trail for classification and policy decisions, which shows what the evidence covers.

Architecture fit

Designed to strengthen the stack already in place.

Best fit for

DPOs, CROs, internal audit, legal and investigation teams. Start where the business impact is highest and expand through repeatable policy.

How Vaultize fits

Vaultize complements the customer’s existing storage, identity, DLP, email, endpoint, network and recovery controls by governing the file after those systems have done their job. Vaultize supports technical controls and evidence; formal legal and regulatory mapping remains customer-specific.

Discovery questions

Three questions to open the conversation.

  1. 1

    Can you produce one sensitive file’s access and sharing history in minutes?

  2. 2

    Which documents, users and external workflows create the highest exposure for file level regulatory compliance audit evidence?

  3. 3

    What happens today when access must be withdrawn, evidence produced or the correct version recovered?

Frequently asked

Clear answers for buyers and evaluators.

Centralize file-level access, sharing, edit, movement and deletion evidence for audit and investigation. Instead of reconstructing the file journey from identity, email, storage and DLP records, the access, sharing, edit, movement, deletion and policy-action records for one governed file belong to a single exportable evidence trail.

A practical next step

See how control stays with every sensitive file.

A focused 30-minute review to map the documents, sharing paths and control gaps that matter most in your environment.

Book the 30-minute review